SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(AP) 505

RAMACHANDRA RAJU
Kancharla Suryavathi – Appellant
Versus
Thota Suryakantham – Respondent


( 1 ) THE revision is directed against the Order of the 1st Additional Subordinate judge, Kakinada, dated 24th January, 1981 rejecting the petitioner s claim for rateables under section 73, Civil Procedure Code.

( 2 ) THE following facts became material. The petitioner is the decree-holder in O. S. No. 517 of 1974 on the file of the District munsif s Court, Kakinada. The decree dated 31st July, 1974 is for money against the 2nd respondent amongst others who are legal representatives of Tota Veeranna who died pending that suit. The petitioner s execution petition E, P. No. 353 of 1979 was filed on 29th August, 1979 in the District muusif s Court, Kakinada, for attachment or moveables. During the pendency of that suit, a house property in Samalkot and certain lands in Venkatakrisbnarayapuram, were attached before judgment. The respondent obtained a preliminary decree for partition dated 30th september, 1972 and a final decree for partition dated 24th September, 1976 against the 1st respondent and others in O. S. No. 95 of 1971 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, kakinada. In execution of the decree for mesne profits, the 1st respondent brought certain house and lands to sale on 26t












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top