( 1 ) THE plaintiff is the appellant. He filed the suit in the trial Court initially for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from blocking the gate marked AB on the southern side of the plaintiffs house and later on, amendment sought for a mandatory injunction directing the defendant to remove the constructions made by him blocking the gate marked AB and the constructions made on the compound wall. The trial Court decreed the suit issuing mandatory injunction directing the defendant to remove construction blocking the gate marked AB and to remove in front of the gate and across the compound wall of the plaintiffs premises running east to west of the H. No 1-7-192 situated at Bakaram. Hyderabad within a period of three months from the date of this decree and granted perpetual injunction restraining the defendant his agents and all other persons claiming through him from blocking the gate marked Ab and from making any construction in front of the gate and across the compound wall running from east to west on the plaintiffs premises referred to above. Challenging that decree, the respondent went in appeal. The lower appellate Court allowed the appeal, and di