A.RAMANUJULU NAIDU, K.MADHAVA REDDY
Narendra Kumar Mehta – Appellant
Versus
Suraj Mehta – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE two appeals arise out of an order made under S. 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) awarding interim maintenance to the wife and the child of the respondent in O. P. L No. 102 of 1981 on the file of the II additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.
( 2 ) THE petitioner herein is the wife and she filed an application under s. 9 of the Act for restitution of conjugal rights on the ground of desertion. On the date of the petition, she had a child aged about two-and-half years. There is no dispute about the relationship between the parties. The husband claims that it was the wife that was guilty of desertion and, therefore, not entitled to the relief. Pending that petition, the wife claimed a sum of Rs. 600. 00 for herself and Rs. 200. 00 for the minor child towards maintenance, and Rs. 2,000. 00 towards legal expenses. In support of her petition, she stated that while she was at Rajkot with her parents, she was somehow maintained by her parents and she was also getting some commission for collecting the Pigmy Bank contributions. She came down to Hyderabad and was staying in the house of her sister expecting the resp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.