SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(AP) 164

A.SEETHARAM REDDY
T. Gopalakrishna – Appellant
Versus
C. Suryanarayana – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against an order allowing an amendment to the plaint sought on behalf of the plaintiff by adding para. 5 (a) as under: "the plaintiff states that the amounts of Rs. 8,000 and Rs. 12,000 respectively were lent to the defendants on the basis of an application filed by them for a loan and also on the basis of the vouchers executed by them for receiving the same. After payments of the amounts, necessary entries are also made in the accounts and thereafter the Hundies were taken. The defendants have also admitted the receipt of the money in the written statement. The plaintiff states that on the basis of these facts, he is entitled to a decree on the original cause of action of payment and also on the basis of the admission contained in the written statement". Add. the words in para. 9 after the words "cause of action for the suit arose on 7th september, 1972". "when the defendants made an application to the plaintiff Corporation for sanction of a loan and thereafter received the money and executed the voucher and thereafter when they executed the Hundi. the words in the same para. 9 after the words: "when the defendants made an application to the plainti


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top