SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(AP) 204

K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, S.MADHUSUDAN RAO
State Of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
Rajkumar Satthi – Respondent


MADHUSUDAN RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision case is registered on a reference made by the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, in Sessions Case No. 54 of 1979 on the file of his Court requesting that the committal of the case made by the IV Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, may be quashed.

( 2 ) THE facts leading up to the reference are : The Inspector of Police, Chikkadapalli, Hyderabad, filed a charge-sheet against three accused alleging that they participated in three incidents forming the same transaction and that they are liable for punishment under sections 452 and 392 read with Section 34, I. P. C. in respect of one incident, under section 324 read with Section 34, I. P. C. in respect of another incident and under section 392, I. P. C. in respect of the third incident. It was requested in the charge-sheet that, in the event of conviction, the three accused may be bound over under section 106, Cr. P. C. besides being sentenced appropriately. It was further mentioned in the charge-sheet that the first accused has 12 previous convictions to his credit and the last conviction was in a case filed in the year 1975. The case was filed in the Court of the IV Metropolitan Mag



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top