SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(AP) 326

PUNNAIAH
T. V. Sarma – Appellant
Versus
A. Naga Koteswara Rao – Respondent


PUNNAYYA, J.

( 1 ) CRL. . R. C. No. 162/1979 is directed against the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ongole in Crl. M. P. No. 43/1979 in sessions Case No. 8/1976.

( 2 ) CRL. R. C. No. 190/1979 is directed against the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad cum-Metropolitan Sessions judge. Hyderabad in Crl. M. P. No. 37/1979 in Sessions Case No. 5/1979

( 3 ) IN both the cases, the same question of law has arisen and hence they can be disposed of by one common judgment.

( 4 ) SESSIONS case No. 5/1979 arose out of a private complaint filed by Sri M. Surajmul, the brother of the deceased Kama Bai. A-1 is the husband of the deceased Kanta Bai. A-2 is the mother and A-3 is the servant of A-1. A-4 Is the younger sister s husband of A-2. A 5 and a-6 are brothers and they are Kavalkar and Police Patel respectively. The offences alleged against the accused are those punishable under Section 120-Bread with Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Surajmul filed the complaint in the Court of the Judicial First Class magistrate, Hyderabad West and the case was committed by the learned magistrate to Sessions Court. The learned Sessions Judge. Hyderabad distric



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top