A.RAMANUJULU NAIDU
Paleti Sivaramakrishnayya – Appellant
Versus
Executive Engineer, N. C. Canals Sathenapalli – Respondent
( 2 ) THE suit filed by the plaintiff is one for injunction restraining the defendants of their associates from getting the bode Channel dug in the line shown as QS in the plaint plan or in any other direction except in the direction shown as AB in the Plaint plan as sanctioned by the Government, The plaintiff is the owner of a land in Demarcation No. 195 to the North of the land on his brother one, Paleti Veeraiah. It is his t case that the line of the field covered by Demarcation No. 195 is from the South to North. There is a canal called "53 P. B. Subminor Canal". According to the plaintiff two bode canal :according to the plaintiff two bode canals AC and AB shown in the plaint plan have their source from plaint plan have their source from "53 P. B. sub-minor canal" and they were originally sanctioned by the Government to irrigate the lands covered by Demarcation Nos. 211, 210 and 195. The first defendant who is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.