SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(SC) 60

RAGHUBAR DAYAL, K.C.DAS GUPTA, K.SUBBA RAO
Dhirendra Nath Gorai: Subal Chandra Nath Saha – Appellant
Versus
Sudhir Chandra Ghosh – Respondent


Advocates:
B.SEN, P.K.GHOSH, SUKUMAR GHOSH

Judgement

SUBBA RAO, J. : These two appeals raise the question of the validity of a court sale held in contravention of S. 35 of the Bengal Money-Lenders Act, 1940 (Bengal Act X of 1940), hereinafter called the Act.

2. The facts in both the appeals may be briefly stated. In Civil Appeal No. 85 of 1961, Sudhir Chandra Ghosh, respondent No. 1, executed a first mortgage in favour of one Provash Chandra Mukherjee, since deceased, for a sum of Rs. 12,000/-. Respondent No. 1 executed a second, third and fourth mortgages in favour of the appellant for a total sum of Rs. 7,700/-. He also executed another mortgage in favour of the 9th respondent. In the year 1948 respondents 2 and 3, representing the first mortgagee s estate, filed Title Suit No. 8 of 1948 in the 7th Additional Court of the Subordinate Judge at Alipore for enforcing the first mortgage. To that suit the puisne mortgagees were also made parties, On May 24, 1948, a preliminary decree by consent, was made in the suit whereunder the judgment-debtor was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 15,473-7-9 to the appellant in 7 equal annual instalments. As the judgment-debtor failed to pay the said amount, in due course a final decree was passed









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top