SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(AP) 126

P.BADUL REDDY
Kanyakaparameswari Varthaka Sangham – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Endowments, A. P. , Hydrabad – Respondent


CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE Kanyaka Parameswari Varthaka Sangham. Ganapavaram is the appellant before us. This appeal under C1. 15 of the Letters Patent has its roots in a petition died by the Appellant, before the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, under Section 77 of the Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act far a declaration that the pavaram in west Godavari District run by the appellant Accretion was not a charitable institution within the meaning of Section 2 (4) of the Ad. The petition under Section 77 was itself necessitated by the fact that the Assistant Commissioner of endowments had issued 4 notice to the appellant to register the Sathram as a Charitable institution under the provisions of Section 38 of the Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act. alleging that the building known as Sathram was constructed by the Appellant, Sangham, a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, that the ownership of We building was always. and continued to be with the Sangham. that there was never any dedication or divestiture, that though part of the building was used for the purpose of lodging travelers pursuant to a resolut














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top