SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(AP) 211

A.SAMBASIVA RAO, S.MADHUSUDAN RAO, V.MADHAVA RAO
Kancherla Purshotham – Appellant
Versus
Kadimcherla Nageswara Rao – Respondent


MADHUSUDAN RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS Full Bench is constituted to resolve a conflict of views in regard to the mode of appropriation of open payments made by an agriculturist debtor towards a debt contracted after the commencement of the Madras Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938 which was adapted in this State as the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Agriculturist Relief Act.

( 2 ) THE appellant is the plaintiff. The contesting respondents 1 to 4 are the defendants 1 to 4 respectively. The second defendant is the undivided son of the first defendant. The defendants 1, and 4 executed a mortgage hand in favour of late Kancherla Narasimham, the father of the plaintiff for Re, 16,000 on 8-11-1951 agreeing to pay the amount in four equal yearly installments of Rs. 4,000 with interest at 10% p. a. and in default of payment of the instalments at 12% compound interest per annum. They made part-payments of Rs. 7,000 on 15-3-53, Rs. 800 and 17-2-55, Rs. 600 on 19-3-55, Rs. 1,400 on 12-6-56, Rs. 1,460 on 22-9-56, Rs. 100 on 12-3-57, Rs. 100 on 7-11-59 and Rs. 950 on 9-6-61 No payments were made subsequent to the payment on 9-6-61. During his lifetime Kancherla Narasimham executed a registered will bequeathi


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top