A.SAMBASIVA RAO
Navadu Nuka Raju – Appellant
Versus
Rajani China Appanna – Respondent
( 1 ) A point of some import is raised in this revision petition. It relates to applications for leave to file suit in forma pauperis. The question is whether a duty is cast on an applicant for such leave to disclose all the properties belonging to him in his application and if he does not, whether such non-disclosure would entail dismissal of his application.
( 2 ) THE material facts are :the petitioner filed a suit for eviction of the respondents from certain properties and for delivering the same to him. He filed an application to file the suit in forma pauperis and in the B Schedule appended to the petition he had shown half joint share in a thatched house worth about Rs. 500. 00 and few items of apparel. The Court-fee payable is Rs. 1,546. 00. The respondents opposed this application saying that he had means to pay the Court-fee and the he had not disclosed in the petition all his assets. In fact in the cross-examination of the petitioner, examined as P. W. 1, it was brought out that he owns some site, and a cattle shed, that house tax was being paid in his name for that property, that there was a granary, and that he got life interest in the site, cattle s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.