SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(AP) 57

C.KONDAIAH
G. Papaiah – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Director, Medical Services, Secunderabad – Respondent


C. KONDAIAH, J.

( 1 ) THIS application by the petitioner, a Chowkidar at Station Health Organisation, Golconda, under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, is to quash the Order No. 4565/p/m-3 dated 3-8-1973 passed by the Assistant Director of Medical Services, Headquarters, Andhra (Indep) Sub-Area, Secunderabad, the respondent herein, withholding his increment for one year, on several grounds.

( 2 ) MR. A. Lakshmanachar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, contends that the impugned order is not a speaking order and it is violative of principles of natural justice as his client was not supplied with a copy of the report of the Enquiry Officer and copies of some other material documents in spite of his requesting for the same. He further urges that charge No. 2 relating to the unauthorised absence of the petitioner from duty from 16th May to 25th May, 1973 is not sustainable in view of the fact that extraordinary leave has been granted by the concerned authority on 18-6-1973 itself and in any event, the first charge relating to misbehaviour of the petitioner on 16/05/1973 is in conflict with charge No. 2 and therefore, the impugned order must be quashed.

( 3 ) THE claim of the







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top