C.V.RAMULU
Ariyur Mohd. Habeebur Rahman – Appellant
Versus
Ansuri Varamma (died) – Respondent
( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the facts are: The father of the revision-petitioners agreed to sell 5 1/2 acres of land, bearing Survey No. 320 situated at Khammam, to the 1st respondent, for a sum of Rs. 3,200. 00 and executed an agreement of sale dated 16-4-1952 having received an advance consideration of Rs. 1,300. 00. The father of the petitioners put the 1st respondent in possession of the property in pursuance of the agreement of sale. Admittedly, a sum of Rs. 200. 00 was paid by the 1st respondent on 5-8-1954 to K. M. Hussain, the Power of Attorney holder of the mother of the petitioners. Subsequently disputes arose between the parties as the balance was not paid and the sale deed was not executed by the petitioners father in favour of the 1st respondent. The 1st respondent alleged that a sum of Rs. 800. 00 was paid to the petitioners on 23-3-1953, but the petitioners denied that payment. The dispute was referred to the arbitration of five named arbitrartors , among whom one K. Appa Rao was to be the Sar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.