SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(AP) 32

C.V.RAMULU
Ariyur Mohd. Habeebur Rahman – Appellant
Versus
Ansuri Varamma (died) – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petitions directed against the judgment and decree in A. S. No. 51 of 1965, whereby the District Judge, Khammam, allowed the appeal and set aside the Award.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the facts are: The father of the revision-petitioners agreed to sell 5 1/2 acres of land, bearing Survey No. 320 situated at Khammam, to the 1st respondent, for a sum of Rs. 3,200. 00 and executed an agreement of sale dated 16-4-1952 having received an advance consideration of Rs. 1,300. 00. The father of the petitioners put the 1st respondent in possession of the property in pursuance of the agreement of sale. Admittedly, a sum of Rs. 200. 00 was paid by the 1st respondent on 5-8-1954 to K. M. Hussain, the Power of Attorney holder of the mother of the petitioners. Subsequently disputes arose between the parties as the balance was not paid and the sale deed was not executed by the petitioners father in favour of the 1st respondent. The 1st respondent alleged that a sum of Rs. 800. 00 was paid to the petitioners on 23-3-1953, but the petitioners denied that payment. The dispute was referred to the arbitration of five named arbitrartors , among whom one K. Appa Rao was to be the Sar



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top