SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(AP) 76

A.GOPAL RAO, A.V.KRISHNA RAO, V.MADHAVA RAO
Ganta Kondamma – Appellant
Versus
Ganta Seethamma – Respondent


EKBOTE, C. J.

( 1 ) THERE were two brothers G. Chenchu Naidu and Narappa Naidu. They constituted a Hindu Joint Family. They owned A schedule immovable properties at Kesavaram village. Chenchu Naidu died undivided some 37 years before without leaving no issue. The plaintiff is the widow of Chenchu Naidu. She claimed maintenance from Narappa Naidu who was the sole surviving coparcener. As a result of some mediation, the plaintiff and Narappa Naidu came to an agreement. Narappa Naidu paid Rs. 400. 00- in full quit of maintenance keeping in view the property of the family. She executed a registered relinquishment deed on 14-9-1936 whereby she gave up all her rights in the family immovable property and also gave up her rights of maintenance against the family. She agreed not to raise any dispute about her maintenance thereafter.

( 2 ) WHILE so, she instituted a suit for recovery of past and future maintenance. She claimed 1/2 putties of paddy, Rs. 300. 00- per annum towards clothing and utensils, and Rs. 3,000. 00- towards provision for residence. She also claimed Rs. 4,950. 00- arrears of maintenance of six years. She contended that the amount paid under Exhibit B-1, the relinquishment








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top