Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : S.OBUL REDDY, V.MADHAVA RAO
Ali Mohd.Khusro - Appellant
Versus
Special Deputy Collector Land Acquisition, Industries - Respondent
Decided On : 11-06-72
SUCCESSION CERTIFICATE - LAND ACQUISITION ACT - SECTION 214 (1) (B) - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT - COMPENSATION - DEBT - EXECUTION OF DECREE - LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES - MUHAMMADAN LAW - MATRUKA - Whether the legal representatives of the deceased decree-holder can execute the decree obtained by the deceased decree-holder in land acquisition proceedings awarding compensation without obtaining a succession certificate under S. 214 (1) (b) of the Indian Succession Act.
Fact of the Case:
The deceased decree-holder, Fareedunnissa Begum, was awarded compensation of Rs. 3,61,816.75 and costs of Rs. 2,002.00 in land acquisition proceedings. The government deposited the compensation amount into court, but she died before she could make an application for withdrawal of the amount. The appellants, the legal representatives of the deceased decree-holder, filed an application for recovery and withdrawal of the amount deposited by the government. The government opposed the application on the ground that the appellants are not entitled to execute the decree without obtaining a succession certificate as required under Section 214 (1) (b) of the Indian Succession Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the legal representatives of the deceased decree-holder cannot execute the decree obtained by the deceased decree-holder in land acquisition proceedings awarding compensation without obtaining a succession certificate under S. 214 (1) (b) of the Indian Succession Act.
Issues: 1. Whether the amount of compensation payable under the Land Acquisition Act is a debt within the meaning of Section 214 (1) (b) of the Indian Succession Act? 2. Whether a succession certificate is necessary in the case of Muslims entitled to the Matruka?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the amount of compensation payable under the Land Acquisition Act is a debt within the meaning of Section 214 (1) (b) of the Indian Succession Act. The court reasoned that the definition of debt in Section 214 (2) is wide enough to include every kind of debt except those excluded from its meaning, and that compensation awarded under a decree of the court is a debt within the meaning of that term as defined in sub-section (2). 2. The court held that a succession certificate is necessary in the case of Muslims entitled to the Matruka. The court reasoned that Section 214 does not exempt, when a claim is made, on succession, either in respect of the effects of the deceased person or in respect of execution of a decree or order for payment of the deceased's debts from obtaining a succession certificate by a person claiming to be entitled to them.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the order of the court below.
( 1 ) THE only question that arises for determination in this civil miscellaneous appeal is whether the legal representatives of the deceased decree-holder (appellants) can execute the decree obtained by the deceased decree-holder in land acquisition proceedings awarding compensation in a sum of Rs. 3. 61. 816-75 to the claimant-decree-holder in respect of the lands acquired from her and the costs awarded to her under the said decree, without obtaining a succession certificate under S. 214 (1) (b) of the Indian Succession Act.
( 2 ) THE facts necessary for determining the question involved are these : The Second Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, in O. P. No. 111 of 1966, by his judgment dated 25-9-1968, awarded compensation of Rupees 3,61. 816-75 and costs of Rs. 2,002. 00 to one Fareedunnissa Begum, the claimant in those proceedings. The Government deposited the compensation amount into Court, but she died before she could make an application for withdrawal of the amount. The present appellants filed an application. E. P. No. 24 of 1970, for recovery and withdrawal of the amount deposited by the Government. Their application was opposed by the government ( (respondent) on the ground that they are not entitled to execute the decree without obtaining a succession certificate as required under Section 214 (1) (b) of the Indian Succession Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). The case of the appellants before the Court below and here as well is that question of obtaining succession certificate does not arise as, under Mohammadan Law, they are entitled to the matruka of deceased and that, even otherwise, under Section 214 (1) (b), a succession certificate is necessary only if the decree had been obtained on the basis of a pre-existing debt and that this provision has no application to an amount of compensation payable under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act. The Court below, on a consideration of the relevant provisions and the decisions cited before it, negatived the contention of the legal representatives of the deceased claimant and dismissed their application.
( 3 ) MR. Gururaja Rao appearing for the appellant contended that the amount of compensation payable under Land Acquisition Act is not a debt so as to attract Section 214 (1) (b) of the Act and, therefore, the Court below went wrong in dismissing the application filed for withdrawal of the compensation amount in Court deposit:
( 4 ) SECTION 214, to the extent revelant for the purpose of disposal of this appeal, reads:"214. (1) No court shall-- (a) pass a decree against a debtor of a deceased person for payment of his debt to a person claiming on succession to be entitled to the effects of the deceased person or to any part thereof, or (b) proceed, upon an application of a person claiming to be so entitled, to execute against such a debtor a decree or order for the payment of his debt, except on the production, by the person so claiming of. . . . . . . . . . (I) a probate or letters of administration evidencing the grant to him of administration to the estate of the deceased, or x x x x (iii) a succession certificate granted under part X and having the debt specified therein, or x x x x (2) The word "debt" in sub-section (1) includes any debt except rent, revenue or profits payable in respect of land used for agricultural purposes. "
( 5 ) THE scope of the two clauses (a) and (b) is this: Clause (a) of sub-section (1) is mandatory and it injucts that a Court shall not pass a decree against a debtor of a deceased person of his debt, unless such person claiming to be entitled to the effects of the deceased person produces a probate or letters of administration or a certificate granted under Section 31 or S. 32 of the Administrator-Generals Act, 1913 mentioning the particular debt or a succession certificate, the object being not only to facilitate collection of debts by those who succeed to the estate of the deceased creditor, but also to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.