A.GOPAL RAO, A.V.KRISHNA RAO
Mangu Ramdas – Appellant
Versus
Madurai Venkataratnam – Respondent
( 1 ) THE Assistant Settlement Officer, Anakapally started a suo motu enquiry under Section 15 of the Madras Estate (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, (hereinafter called " the Act") to determine the nature and history of the land and to consider the claims of the land holders for the grant of ryotwari patta.
( 2 ) AT a later stage of the said enquiry two land-holders claimed patta for themselves alleging inter alia that the land in question is zeryothi private land.
( 3 ) THE 1st respondent in the proceedings opposed the claim of the land-holders and claimed patta for himself contending that he has the occupancy rights and he is therefore entitled to the patta.
( 4 ) THE 2nd respondent the daughter - in - law of the original tenant contended that her father-in-law was the original tenant and had occupancy rights. He having died the 2nd respondent is the legal heir and therefore entitled to the grant of ryotwari patta.
( 5 ) THE Assistant Settlement Officer after proper enquiry held on 23-5-1959 that the land is darmilla inam and consequently the land-holders are not entitled to patta under Section 15 of the Act. In the same order he however, held th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.