SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(AP) 176

A.GOPAL RAO, A.V.KRISHNA RAO
Mangu Ramdas – Appellant
Versus
Madurai Venkataratnam – Respondent


GOPAL RAO EKBOTE, J.

( 1 ) THE Assistant Settlement Officer, Anakapally started a suo motu enquiry under Section 15 of the Madras Estate (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, (hereinafter called " the Act") to determine the nature and history of the land and to consider the claims of the land holders for the grant of ryotwari patta.

( 2 ) AT a later stage of the said enquiry two land-holders claimed patta for themselves alleging inter alia that the land in question is zeryothi private land.

( 3 ) THE 1st respondent in the proceedings opposed the claim of the land-holders and claimed patta for himself contending that he has the occupancy rights and he is therefore entitled to the patta.

( 4 ) THE 2nd respondent the daughter - in - law of the original tenant contended that her father-in-law was the original tenant and had occupancy rights. He having died the 2nd respondent is the legal heir and therefore entitled to the grant of ryotwari patta.

( 5 ) THE Assistant Settlement Officer after proper enquiry held on 23-5-1959 that the land is darmilla inam and consequently the land-holders are not entitled to patta under Section 15 of the Act. In the same order he however, held th

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top