SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(AP) 214

ANANTA NARAYANA AYYAR, VENKATESAM
State Of A. P. Through the Chief Secretary – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Mazharuddin Ahmed – Respondent


VENKATESAM, J.

( 1 ) THIS Appeal is preferred by the State of Andhra Pradesh (defendant) against the decree and judgment of the II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil court, Hyderabad, in O. S. No. 7 of 1960 on his file, while Mohammed Mazharuddin ahmed (plaintiff) has preferred the Cross-Objections. The relevant facts leading to this appeal may shortly be stated.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff was appointed as a probationary Munsiff-Magistrate in the subordidinate Judicial Service of the erstwhile Hyderabad State on 16th June, 1948, and was later absorbed in a clear vacancy of the post of Munsif-Magistrate on 21st March, 1949 in the grade of Rs. 400 to Rs. 800 (O. S. ). He was posted in July, 1953 as Munsif Magistrate at Omerga in Osmanabad District. When the Chief Justice of Hyderabad High Court visited Omerga on 20th July, 1953, some of the pleaders submitted an application to him making complaints and demanding the immediate transfer of the plaintiff. On 13th August, 1953, the Registrar of Hyderabad High court served on him a charge-sheet containing as many as nineteen charges, and requiring the plaintiff to show cause why action should not be taken against him imposing the penalty mention

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top