SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(AP) 92

MANOHAR PERSHAD, SHARFUDDIN AHMED
C. Venkatappa Naidu – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


MANOHER PERSHAD, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ appeal is directed against the judgment of our learned brother Gopalakrishnan Nair dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant for the issue of a writ of certiorarl to quash G. O. Rt. No. 412, Home (Transport III) Department dated 6/02/1965 passed by the Government in Home Department, confirming the order dated 9-10-1884 of the Transport Appellate Authority The facts leading to this appeal are:

( 2 ) THE 4th respondent was plying two stage carriage on the Markapur-Nandyal road. One Venkatasubbarao obtained another stage carriage permit to ply on the same route which was granted with tenative fixed timings. Thereafter he applied for rotation of timings on the route to cover all the buses plied on it. The Regional Transport Authority, Kurnool granted rotation of timings as prayed for by Venkatasubbarao. The 4th respondent thereupon preferred an appeal to the State Transport Authority. That appeal was rejected as time-barred. Aggrieved by the order he filed a revision to the Government which also was dismissed. He thereupon came to this court in Writ Petn. No. 894 of 1959. This petition was dismissed subject to the directions that the Governm














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top