SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(AP) 248

CHANDRASEKHARA SASTRI
Santhannagari Ramayya – Appellant
Versus
Narasimhapuram Narayana Chetty – Respondent


CHANDRA SEKHARA SASTRY, J.

( 1 ) THIS second Appeal arises out of a suit for a declaration of the plaintiffs easementary right for free access of light and air through the ventilators shown as V-l and V-2 in the southern wall of the plaintiffs house shown as FGA in the plaint plan and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants and their men from in any way interfering with the plaintiffs rights by putting up any construction in their site and for a mandatory injunction for the removal of the Varanaku put up by the defendants adjacent to the plaintiffs southern wall obstructing the access of the usual light and air through these ventilators. The plaintiff claimed that he acquired a right to receive light and air through the two ventilators by such enjoyment for over the prescribed period In fact the plaintiff- purchased the suit house in the year 1915 under Ex A-l dated 15-2-1915. Even by that time there were these two ventilators.

( 2 ) THE defendants plea was that there was an agreement between their predecessors-in-title and the plaintiffs predecessors-in-title initially and again between the plaintiff and the predecessor-in-title of the defendants when the plaintiff pu






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top