SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(AP) 32

P.SATYANARAYANA RAJU, CHANDRASEKHARA SASTRI
R. Narapa Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Jagarlamudi Chandramouli – Respondent


P. SATYANARAYANA RAJU, C. J.

( 1 ) THESE two contempt cases are connected and it will be convenient to deal with them together as they both arise out of exactly that me facts.

( 2 ) IN C. C. No. 19 of 1964 the petitioner is Sri R. Narapa Reddy. There are ten respondents. They are: (1) Sri Jagarlamudi Chandramouli; (2) Sri A. Sanjeevaiah, (3) Sri M. Seshagirirao, (4) Sri Medarametla Rosayya, (5) Sri Muvva Ramachandrayya, (6) Sri K. Sreeramamurty, (7) Sri Karasala Singayya Chowdary; (8) Sri P. Kondiah; (9) Sri Chintapalli Jagannadharao and (10) Sri Patibandla Sivaligaiah.

( 3 ) IN C. C. No. 20 of 1964 the petitioner is Sri Jagarlamudi Chandramouli. The respondents are Sri T. Chakra Reddy and Sri J. Rajasekhara Reddy. Additional District Munsif, Guntur.

( 4 ) WE may briefly sketch the sequence of events culminating in the present cases in order to explain how the alleged contempts arise.

( 5 ) THE Guntur District Co-operative Marketing Society Limited, Guntur (hereinafter referred to as the District Marketing Society), is a Society registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, with its head Office at Guntur. Its area of operations extends to the entire revenue District of Guntur. I






































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top