SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(AP) 218

N.KUMARAYYA, P.SATYANARAYANA RAJU
Syed Alam – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Khader Qureshi – Respondent


P. SATYANARAYANA RAJU, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference made by the Munsif-Magistrate of Vikrabad under O. XLVI, R. 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It reads as follows:-"whether after G. O. Ms. No. 1295 Home (Courts-A), dated 16-7-62, Government of Andhra Pradesh (Published in the Gazette, dated 9-8-62 at p. 2041) and G. O. Ms. No. 125, dated 6-7-62 of the Government of Andhra Pradesh the subordinate Courts can entertain pleadings and applications, etc. , in English language and whether the parties can be allowed to file their pleadings, applications, etc. , in English after furnishing a translation of the same to the opposite party in Telugu or Urdu if he so requires. "

( 2 ) THE material portion of the Government Order referred to in the Reference reads as follows:-"notification No. 1. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-s. (2) of S. 137 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Central Act, V of 1908), and in supersession of all the previous notifications on the subject, the Governor of Andhra Pradesh hereby declares that the languages mentioned in Column (2) of the Schedule below shall be the languages of the Courts subordinate to the High Court in the corresponding district












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top