SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(AP) 272

GOPALRAO EKBOLE
Vuppalapati Butchiraju – Appellant
Versus
Rajah Sri Ranga Satyanarayana Ramachandra Venkata Narasimha Bhupala Bhalavayunim Varu – Respondent


GOPAL RAO EKBOTE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is from the decision of the Additional District Judge, Nellore given on 6/04/1959 whereby he allowed the appeal filed by the 1st defendant and after disallowing the appeal preferred by the plaintiffs dismissed the plaintiffs suit in toto.

( 2 ) THE necessary facts in order to appreciate the contentions raised before me are that the 1st defendant entered into an agreement to sell his lands admeasuring 27 acres 35 cents for a sum of Rs. 6,000. 00 to the plaintiffs, and after receiving an advance of Rs. 300. 00, executed an agreement to that effect on 12/05/1953, Ex. A-1. It was agreed under the terms of the said agreement that the balance will be paid on or before 4/06/1953, and that the sale deed would be got executed and registered. It was stated that the plaintiffs took the balance of money on 4/06/1953 to the 1st defendant, who declined to receive the same. It was alleged that the plaintiffs were ready and willing to perform their part of the contract, but the 1st defendant entered into an agreement to sale or relinquish his rights in favour of defendants 2 and 5, and executed an agreement to that effect on 22-6-1953. In pursuance of that agr






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top