SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(AP) 36

N.KUMARAYYA, P.CHANDRA REDDY
D. Muralidhar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Paga Pulla Reddy – Respondent


CHANDRA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the judgment of the Election Tribunal, Hyderabad, setting aside the election of the appellant, who was returned to the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly in the general elections held in February 1962 from the Alampur Constituency (Mahaboobnagar District ).

( 2 ) THE scat was contested by three candidates including the appellant and the respondents but the contest was keen between the appellant and the respondent. The polling was field on 22-2-1962. The appellant obtained 20,715 valid votes as against his nearest rival, the respondent, who secured 20,548 valid votes, the margin between the two being only 167.

( 3 ) THE respondent presented a petition under Section 81 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 challenging Lie validity of this election and for a declaration that he was duly elected inter alia on the ground that the appellant got a drama "satya Harischandra" enacted on the 15/02/1962, a week before the polling day, A one of the villages within this constituency, to induce the electors to cast their votes in his favour, that he procured a lorry and hired bullock-carts for conveying the voters to some of the polling






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top