SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(AP) 86

P.SATYANARAYANA RAJU, ANANTA NARAYANA AYYAR
Nizam Sugar Factory Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
City Municipality, Bodhan – Respondent


ANANTHANARAYANA AYYAR, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is Nizam Sugar Factory represented by its General Manager. It has prayed for issue of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the order in Case No. 117/a/7 of 1960 dated 6-2-1961 to the effect that a large specified amount was due from the petitioner as water tax. The two respondents are the City Municipality. Bodhan, represented by its Executive Officer and the City Municipal Committee, Bodhan represented by its President.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts are as follows : In 1492, the City Municipality of Bodhan came into existence. Its jurisdiction included a large block of buildings belonging to the petitioner-factory which had been existing from a long time back along with a complete water supply system serving those blocks of buildings. In 1946-47, the Municipal Committee, Bodhan started its water works and began supplying a limited area within the Municipality. It has not extended its water supply to block of buildings belonging to the petitioner. The nearest public water tap which has been erected by the Municipality is far away from the blocks of buildings belonging to the petitioner. (2a) The co






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top