SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(AP) 75

GOPALA KRISHNAN NAIR
Pampana Suryarao – Appellant
Versus
Seelam Nageswararao – Respondent


( 1 ) THESE two writ petitions have been heard together as desired by the learned Counsel appearing in them because they raise substantially the same questions for decision. These petitions ask for certiorari to quash certain orders passed by the Election Commissioner appointed under the Rules for Decision of Election disputes under the Madras District Municipalities Act, 1920-hereinafter called the Rules. Writ Petition No. 388 of 1964 relates to an election to the Ramachandra puram municipal Council from Ward No. 6. The petitioner was declared elected.

( 2 ) THEREUPON the respondent, who was the rival candidate at the election, filed an election Petition before the Election Commissioner under rule 2 of the Rules for setting aside the election and declaring him duly elected. One of the main grounds for impugning the validity of petitioner s election was that, there was impersonation of dead voters. A schedule to the election petition mentioned the names of 8 dead persons who were allegedly impersonated at the election. Under rule 2 (1), the election petition had to be filed within seven days from the date of declaration of the result of the election. The election petition in questi








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top