SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(AP) 156

VENKATESAM
State Of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
Govinda Raja Rice Mill Contractors Co. , Chebrolu – Respondent


VENKATASWAMI, J.

( 1 ) C. M. As. 48 and 72 of 1962 are appeal and a cross appeal. Both of them arise out of a common order of the learned Subordinate Judge, Eluru in E. A. 287 of 1961 in O. S. 28 of 1951. The facts necessary for a proper appreciation of the contentions of the parties will now be stated.

( 2 ) THESE two C. M. As. 48 and 72 of 1962 arise out of E. A. 287 of 1961 in O. S. 28 of 1951, while C. M. As. 93 and 104 of 1962 arise out of E. A. 219 of 1961 in O. S. 13 of 1952 on the file of the Subordinate Judges Court, Eluru. These suits viz. , O. S. 28 of 1951 were two of the batch of suits files against the Government by the rice millers in the Districts of East and West Godavari and Krishna who were authorised to procure paddy and rice from the producers and to sell them in the market at the price fixed by the Government. The difference between the price at which they were purchased and the price at which they were directed to be sold was asked to be made over to the Government. Several millers made over the difference in compliance with the orders of the Government, and later filed suits for the recovery of those amounts on the ground that they were entitled to the differ





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top