N.KUMARAYYA, SHARFUDDIN AHMED
In Re: Javvaji Uthanna – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent
( 1 ) THE short point that falls for determination in these four revision petitions is whether having regard to the provisions of Section 479-A (1), Criminal Procedure Code, it was obligatory on the Additional Sessions Judge to give the petitioners opportunity of being heard after recording a Ending contemplated by that Sub-clause and before making a complaint in writing for the offence of perjury under section 193, I. P. C.
( 2 ) THE petitioners were called as eye-witnesses (P. Ws. 1 to 4) in Sessions Case No. 19/62 in relation to the stab injuries inflicted on P. W. 1 and E. Venkataramana as a result of which Venkataiamana died on 2-11-1961. These witnesses before the committal Court as also before the Magistrate under Section 164, Cri. P. C. , deposed that they had actually witnessed the stabbing of the deceased, Venkataramana, by A. 1 and gave all other details of the occurrence. They deposed to the fact that P. W. 1 was stabbed by A. 2 and gave all further details in relation thereto. But when they were called as witnesses in the Sessions Court, they turned hostile to the prosecution and completely gave a go-by to the fact of their having witnessed the stabbing o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.