SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(AP) 41

P.SATYANARAYANA RAJU, VENKATESAM
D. R. Adinarayanaswamy – Appellant
Versus
Girraju Papamma – Respondent


( 1 ) THESE two appeals, Nos. 84 of 1958 and 348 of 1958 are against a common judgment of the Dist. J. , Anantapur, in O. S. Nos. 18 of 1957 and 45 of 1957 respectively. The earlier suit was for partition of the plaint schedule lands, and separate possession of 2/5th share, while the latter was for the recovery of profits in respect of the same lands. Parties are the same in both the suits.

( 2 ) ONE Dugga Ramanna of Dhannavaram had four wives. By his second wife, he had two sons, plaintiffs 1 and 2 herein, while by his fourth wife he had five daughters, viz. , Papamma (D-1), Subbamma (deceased), Lakshmamma (D-2), Ran-gamma and Alavelamma. Ramanna died in or about 1926 and before his death, he executed a registered will, Ex. A-14 dated 15-8-1924, where-under he bequeathed the suit lands called Koneru Madi, covered by old Survey No. 583, New Survey No. 442, measuring 5 acres 33 cents, and bearing an assessment of Rs. 47. 00 to his five daughters absolutely to be taken by them in equal shares, and in the event of death of any of them it was provided that the other daughters should take her share equally. The will also bequeathed other properties to his other children, plaintiffs, and

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top