SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(AP) 147

P.CHANDRA REDDY, CHANDRASEKHARA SASTRI
Pendyala Narasimham – Appellant
Versus
Pendyala Venkata Narasimha Rao – Respondent


REDDY, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the preliminary decree of the Subordinate judge Narasaraopet in O. S. No. 7 2 of 1953. The 1st defendant is the appellant. It arises our of an action laid by the respondent herein for recovering the properties in question for avoiding the alienations made by the 1st defendant and for an account of the management of the properties by the 1st defendant.

( 2 ) THE facts material for the purpose of this appeal are briefly these. One Pendyala Narasimham had four sons by name Venkayya, Ramalingam, Punnaiah and Satyanarayana. The first of the sons pre-deceased his father. Narasiham died in 1928 leaving behind him three sons Ramalinga, Punnaiah and Satyanarayana. Ramalingam died in 1930 survived by his widow, Anantamma. His younger brothers died in 1934 and 1935 respectively issueless. In 1952, the widow of Ramalingam adopted the plaintiff. Shortly thereafter, the adopted boy required the 1st defendant by registered notice to deliver possession of all the properties belonging to his adoptive father and to render him an account of the management by the 1st defendant. As this demand was not complied with, the action giving rise to this appea






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top