SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(AP) 91

SATYANARAYANA RAJU, ANANTA NARAYANA AYYAR
Nannapaneni Narasingarayudu – Appellant
Versus
Nannapeneni Ankineedu – Respondent


ANANTANARAYANA AYYAR, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals arise out of a common Judgment and Decree in O. S. Nos. 12 and 13 of 1953 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, tenali. O. S. No. 12 of 1953 is a suit filed by Nannapaneni Ramamma for recovery of rs. 12,983-4-3 against four defendants which is made up of (a) Rs. 8,880, value of the properties as on i8th April, 1952, the date when the plaintiff was dispossessed, and (b) Rs. 4,103-4-3, mesne profits ascertained in the final decree proceedings as payable by this plaintiff in LA. No. 1755 of 1952, in O. S. No. 9 of 1945, with proportionate costs. The learned Subordinate Judge awarded a decree in favour of the plaintiff for Rs. 5,240-2-0 against the first defendant and for Rs. 6,288-2-3 jointly and severally against defendants 2 to 4 with proportionate costs. Defendants 3 and 4 have consequently preferred A. S. No 13 of 1955 against the above judgment and decree. Plaintiff has filed a Memorandum of Cross-objections in so far as it went against her.

( 2 ) O. S. No. 13 of 1953 is a suit to recover Rs. 7,538-12-7 against three defendants which consisted of (a) Rs. 5,120 as damages as the market value of the suit property on 18th April, 1952,























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top