SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(AP) 302

M.SESHACHALAPATI, P.SATYANARAYANA RAJU
Chilamakuri Chinna Pullappa – Appellant
Versus
Guruka Chinna Bayanna – Respondent


RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from the judgement ans decree of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Anantapur, in Original Suit No. 58 of 1955.

( 2 ) THE facts material for appreciating the question debated before us are not in dispute. The plaint schedule proporties belonged to one Toomula Hanumappa, resident of Kottalapalli in the Anantapur District. His wife was Viyyamma. He had a son and a daughter. His son, Peddayya died shortly after his marriage. Hanumappa executed a will on 19/12/1941. He died on 22/07/1942. His widow Viyyamma, died on 2 2/02/1954. Peddakka, the daughter of Hanumappa, who was married to the 1st defendant predeceased her mother on 8/07/1945. Defendants 1 and 2 arebrother and are the sisters sons of Hanumappa. Plaintiff is the son of another sister of Hanumappa. He instituted the suit on 17/11/1955 for a declaration of his title to a 1/3rd share out of the properties comprised in the estate of Hanumappa and for partition and seperate posession of one such share.

( 3 ) THE genuineness of the will was not seriousl disputed by the plaintiff. It could not have been otherwise because the will was registered and the testator lived for seven months after its execu


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top