SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(AP) 30

A.V.KRISHNA RAO, SANJEEVA ROW NAIDU
Marrapu Narayanamma – Appellant
Versus
Marrapu Satyanarayana – Respondent


RAO, J.

( 1 ) 1. This is a complainants appeal under Section 417, Sub-section (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter mentioned as the Code) against the acquittal of respondents 1 to 7 by the lower appellate court and raises an important question of law as to the construction and effect of Section 409, Sub-section (2) of the Code.

( 2 ) THE material facts are briefly these : Respondents 1 to 7 were convicted and sentenced in C. C. No. 124 of 1956 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Parvathipur, for certain offences punishable under Section 494, Indian Penal Code. They appealed to the Court of Sessions, Visakhapatnam, and the appeal was admitted by the Sessions Judge as Criminal Appeal No. 387 of 1956. Before the appeal came on for hearing, the Sessions Judge who was also the District Judge, Sri B. T. M. Raghavacharyulu, died on 3/01/1957. The State Government appointed Sri K. Jagannatha Rao on 15/02/1957, to act as District and Sessions Judge in the vacancy and be assumed charge of the office on 27/02/1957. Meanwhile on 8/01/1957, the High Court permitted the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam Sri W. V. V. Sundara Rao, to perform the cu





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top