SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(AP) 250

Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : BASI REDDI, BHIMASANKARAM
In Re: Poreddi Venkata Reddy - Appellant
Versus
. - Respondent
Decided On : 12-05-59

The judgment emphasizes the importance of scrutinizing evidence in faction cases and the need for substantial and compelling reasons to overturn acquittals.

Headnote:

RIOTING - CRIMINAL LAW - Section 148 I. P. C., Section 302 read with Section 34 I. P. C., Section 325 read with Section 34 I. P. C., Section 326 read with Section 34 I. P. C., Section 324 read with Section 34 I. P. C., Section 19 (f) of the Indian Arms Act - The judgment discusses the charges against the accused, their convictions, and sentences under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Indian Arms Act.

Fact of the Case:

A serious rioting with deadly weapons took place in a village resulting in the murder of two persons and injuries to five others. The accused were tried on 15 charges including rioting, murder, and causing hurt.

Finding of the Court:

The court convicted some of the accused for rioting armed with deadly weapons, acquitted some on murder charges due to lack of clear evidence, and sentenced others for causing hurt.

Issues: The main issues were the involvement of the accused in the rioting, murder, and causing hurt, and the acceptance of alibi pleas.

Ratio Decidendi: The court accepted the evidence of some witnesses while discarding others due to their highly partisan nature. The court also scrutinized the alibi pleas and found them to be false in some cases.

Final Decision: The court acquitted some accused, convicted others for various offenses, and directed the sentences to run concurrently.

REDDY, J.

( 1 ) ON the morning of 7-3-1957, between 7-30 and 8 a. m. , a serious rioting with deadly weapons took place in the village of Nemilladinne, in the course of which two persons were butchered in cold blood and five others, who went to their rescue, received injuries at the hands of the rioters. The two murdered persons, who were brothers, were Venkatrami Reddi and Ella Reddi, and will be referred to hereinafter as Deceased-1 and Deceased-2 respectively. The injured persons were Rami Reddy (P. W. 1), Ramakka (P. W. 2), Venkatamma (P. W. 3), Subbamma (P. W. 4) and Balanna (P. W. 5 ). P. W. 1 is the father of the deceased. P. W. 2 is the sister of the deceased; P. W. 3 is the wife of P. W. 1s brother; P. W. 4 is the widow of Deceased-1 and P. W. 5 is a partisan of the Deceased. Deceased-1 sustained a gun-shot wound to the forehead besides 10 incised wounds on his body caused by spears and hatches, and death was due to shock and haemorrhage as a result of multiple fractures of skull bones and ribs, and injuries to the vital organs viz, brain, left and right huigs and liver. Deceased-2 sustained a gun shot wound in the thigh and as many as 36 incised wounds all over his body caused by hatchets and spears, and death in bis case was due to shock and haemorrhage as a result of multiple fractures of the skull bones, mandible, left radius and ribs and injuries to vital organs viz. heart, lungs, liver, stomach, and spinal cord. P. Ws. 1 to 5 received comparatively minor injuries caused by spears or hatchets; and P. W. 5 had also a gun-shot injury on the left forearm.

( 2 ) IN connection with this incident 19 persons were arraigned before the learned Sessions Judge. Cuddapah Division, in Sessions Case No. 47 of 1957. Of them Poreddi Venkatasubba Reddi, Accused No. 3, was murdered while the case was pending before the Sessions Court and so the. case against him abated. The remaining 18 accused, viz. Accused 1, 2 and 4 to 19 were tried by the learned Sessions Judge on 15 charges.

( 3 ) THE 1st charge was against all the 18 accused under Section 148 I. P. C. rioting armed with deadly weapons -- A-1 and A-2 with guns; A-4 to A-8 and A-12 to A-15 and 18 and 19 with spears and A-9 to 11, 16 and 17 with hatchets, and the common object of the unlawful assembly was stated as attacking and killing Deceased-1 and Deceased-2 and their partisans.

( 4 ) THE 2nd charge was against all the 18 accused under Section 302 read with Section 34 I. P. C. for having conjointly and in furtherance of their common intention caused the death of Deceased-1.

( 5 ) THE 3rd charge also was against all the 18 accused under Section 302 read with Section 34 I. P. C. for baying conjointly and in furtherance of their common intention caused the death of Deceased-2.

( 6 ) CHARGES 4 to 13 related to the causing of hurt in the course of the same transaction to P. Ws. 1 to 5.

( 7 ) CHARGES 14 and 15 were against A-1 and A-2 under Section 19 (f) of the Indian Arms Act for having been in possession of unlicensed guns.

( 8 ) HE teamed Sessions Judge accepted the plea of alibi set up by the 1st accused and acquitted him of all charges.

( 9 ) ON the 1st charge, the learned Sessions Judge convicted the remaining 17 accused viz. A-2 and 4 to 19 under Section 148 I. P. C. and sentenced each of them to 2 years rigorous imprisonment.

( 10 ) ON the 2nd charge which was for the murder of Deceased-1, all the accused were acquitted.

( 11 ) ON the 3rd charge, which related to the murder of Deceased-2 the learned Judge convicted A-4 to 19 under Section 325 read with Section 34 I. P. C. and sentenced each of them to 3 years rigorous imprisonment. He acquitted A-2 of this charge. It will be noted that there was thus an implied order of acquittal on the charge of murder so far as A-4 to 19 were concerned.

( 12 ) THE 4th aud 5th charges were in respect of the attack on P. W. 1. A-4 and A-9 were convicted on Charge No. 4 under Section 326 read with Section 34 I. P. C. and A-2, 8, 10, 11, 1





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top