SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(AP) 87

M.SESHACHALAPATI, P.CHANDRA REDDY
Ahmed Ali Khan Bahadur (died) – Appellant
Versus
Banguluru Veeralla – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS is a connected batch of Letters Patent Appeals against the Judgment of Subba Rao. L. P. A. Nos. 67 and 73 to 81 of 1954 are against A. S. Nos. 199 of 1948 and A. S. Nos. 352 to 359 and 360 of 1950 on the file of the High Court of Madras which arise out of O. S. No. 16 of 1947 and other 9 connected suits On the file of the Sub-Court, Tenali. Letters Patent Appeals Nos. 68 to 72 of 1954 are against the decision in Civil Miscellaneous Appeals Nos. 442 to 446 of 1948 which arise out of the decision of the learned Subordinate Judge of Bapatla dismissing E. A. Nos. 27ft to 287 of 1945. L. P. As. Nos. 33 and 34 of 1955 are against the decision of Subba Rao, C. J. , in S. As. Nos. 100l and 1130 of 1950 arising out of A. S. Nos. 505 and 506 of 1948 on the file of the District Judge, Guntur against O. S. Nos. 59 and 60 of 194t on the file of the Sub-Court, Bapatla.

( 2 ) THOUGH the questions raised in these appeals-are common,, it would be convenient to deal with them separately. We will first deal with L. P. A. Nos. 67 and 73 to 81 of 1954. 2a. It would be necessary to set out in brief outline the essential facts of this protracted and complicated litigation.

( 3 ) ONE Nawab Nazi




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top