SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(AP) 177

Manthina Venkatapathi Raju – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) THE land acquisition proceedings involved in this petition relates to a small extent of 25 cents of land covered by S. Nos. 2/1-B and 8 lying in the village of suryaraopeta of Kakinada Taluk, East Godavari District. A notification was issued under section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act I of 1894 that the two properties included in the two survey numbers referred to therein, measuring in all Ac. 7-57 situate in that village were needed for a public purpose, namely, providing house sites to the landless labourers, that the District Harijan Welfare Officer, Kakinada, was authorised to exercise powers under section 14 (2) of the Act and that the District harijan Welfare Officer was appointed to perform the functions of the Collector. Subsequently, the notification under section 6 of the Act was issued and published in the Fort St. George Gazette on 9th May, 1950. These lands which originally belonged to one Peda Venkanna were purchased prior to the notification by a number of persons including the petitioner who bought 23 cents of land in S. No. 2/1-B. As the efforts of the petitioner and the other vendees from the said Venkanna to persuade the Government to drop the land acqu




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top