SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(AP) 101

K.SUBBA RAO, P.SATYANARAYANA RAJU
Padmaraju Subba Raju – Appellant
Versus
Padmaraju Koneti Raju – Respondent


( 1 ) RAO, C. J. (1) This is a Criminal Revision Petition agagainst the order of the Additional First Class Magistrate, Thirupati, under S. 145 (6), Criminal P. C. declaring that the "a" party respondent is entitled to possession of the two houses, pandal and the back yard until evicted therefrom in due course of law. The "a" party respondent filed a petition on 7-2-1953 before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Executive) Chandragiri, stating that the "b" party respondents were interfering with his possession of the two houses belonging to him, which for convenience will be described as rectangular and round houses.

( 2 ) THE case of the "a" party respondent was that he was in possession of the rectangular house in his own right and that Subbamma, his elder sister, was with his permission residing in the round house and that the "b" party respondents were trying to take forcible possession from him of the said two houses. The "b" party respondents contention was that Subbamma was the owner of the said two houses, that she sold the same to P. W. 1 on 4-11-1952 and put him in possession of the said two houses and that he was living in the round houses with his permission. It is common c























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top