SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 577

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Majeti Basavamma – Appellant
Versus
Majeti Venkateswara Rao – Respondent


ORDER

The plaintiffs in O.S.No. 96 of 1997, on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Tenali, filed this revision, aggrieved by the order dated 31-8-2005, passed by the trial Court.

2. The petitioners filed the suit for the relief of declaration of title and recovery of possession, vis-a-vis the suit schedule property. The respondents are defendants in that suit. The trial of the suit commenced and the recording of evidence of the petitioners was concluded. The 2nd respondent herein filed his affidavit, in lieu of chief-examination as D.W.1. Several documents were enclosed , to the affidavit. The petitioners raised serious objection for receiving of two documents viz, a deed of family arrangement dated 5-5-1993, marked as EX.B-34, and a family dispute resolution, dated 30-1-1994, marked as X-8.

Extensive submissions were made on behalf of the petitioners, about the admissibility of the said documents. The objections mainly related to the registration and stamp duty.

Through the order under revision, the trial court overruled the objections, and received the documents.

3. Sri S. Ranga Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the documents have the effect of bringi












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top