SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 671

P.S.NARAYANA
G. Anand Kumar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad – Respondent


ORDER

Heard both the learned counsel.

2. The Writ Petition is filed praying for a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in insisting for No Objection Certificate (NOC) from Joint Collector, Hyderabad and not receiving the building application of the petitioners in respect of premises bearing No.8-3-168/P/1 , Erragadda, opposite ESI Hospital, Hyderabad and not granting building permission as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 and Building Bye-Laws, 1981 and consequently direct the respondents to receive the building application of the petitioners and grant building permissions without insisting No Objection ,certificate (NOC) from the Joint Collector, Hyderabad and pass such other suitable orders.

3. It is stated that the petitioners vendor purchased the property through registered sale deed dated 2-9-1974 and their vendors vendor purchased the said property through registered sale deed dated 5-1-1973. It is also stated that the petitioners in order to construct residential house in the said property, approached the 2nd respondent office on 17-6-2006 with building application form enclosing all the required do



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top