Heard Sri A. Veera Swamy, the learned counsel representing the revision petitioner and Sri Kunareddy Anji Reddy, the learned counsel representing the respondent.

2. This revision petition is filed as against an order dated 23-09-2005 made in I.A. No.944 of 2005 in O.P.No.104 of 2001 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Tanuku. The revision petitioner is the husband of the respondent.

3. This is a matrimonial dispute. For the purpose of convenience, the parties hereinafter would be referred to as wife and husband only.

4. The wife filed O.P.No.104 of 2001 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Tanuku praying for dissolution of marriage on the grounds of husband being of unsound mind and sexually impotent and also made several elaborate allegations. The husband, who is the respondent in the main O.P. denied those allegations. A specific stand was taken in para 13 of the counter that she had some trouble in connection with her uterus even before the marriage and in the said context, she cannot conceive and beget children and she was treated in England and finally various attempts to use the sperm of respondent proved futile in view of the condition of her uterus. It is needless to