B.PRAKASH RAO, RAMESH RANGANATHAN
P. S. R. Krishna – Appellant
Versus
Union of India rep. , by its Secretary, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology – Respondent
(Per Ramesh Ranganathan, J.)
Seeking to have the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench in O.A. No. 358 of 2005, on its being renumbered as O.A No. 1954 of 2005 dated 31-10-2005 before the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi, quashed, W.P. No. 25511 of 2005 is filed.
2. Sri N. Janardhan Rao and 25 others, (Applicants in O.A No. 330 of 2005 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, which was renumbered as O.A. No. 1959 of 2005 before the Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi), have filed W.P. No. 26712 of 2005 questioning the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No. 1959 .of 2005 and batch dated 31-10-2005 and the absorption process of ITS Group-A officers, as contemplated in proceedings dated 24-03-2005, as arbitrary and illegal.
3. Sri G. Parameswar Reddy, (General Manager, West, Hyderabad Telecom District, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited), has filed W.P. No. 12161 of 2006 before this Court to quash the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No. 1954 of 2005 and batch and for a consequential direction to declar
Ashwani Kumar Singh v. U.P. Public Service Commission
STATE OF Uttar Pradesh Vs SYNTHETICS AND CHEMICALS LIMITED
OIL AND NATURAL GAS COMMISSION Vs UTPAL KUMAR BASU
SOUTH EAST ASIA SHIPPING COMPANY LIMITED Vs NAV BHARAT ENTERPRISES Private Limited
ARUNAGARWAL Vs NAGREEKA EXPORTS (P)LTD.
State of Haryana Vs State of Punjab
KUSUM INGOTS AND ALLOYS LIMITED Vs Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.