SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 1139

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
M. Thippe Swamy () – Appellant
Versus
L. Lalitha Kumari – Respondent


ORDER

In the general election held in the month of April 2004, the petitioner and the first respondent (hereinafter referred to as "the respondent") tiled their nominations for 141 Palamaner (SC) Assembly Constituency of Andhra Pradesh. While the petitioner contested on behalf of the Indian National Congress, the respondent represented the Telugu Desam Party. After following the notified schedule in the matter of filing, scrutiny and withdrawal of nominations, polling was held to the constituency on 26-04-2004. The petitioner secured 67,124 votes, whereas the respondent got 67,861 votes. An independent candidate secured 3,029 votes. The respondent was declared as elected.

2. The petitioner filed this Election Petition challenging the election of the respondent. He seeks declaration to the effect that the election of the respondent as Member of the Legislative Assembly representing 141 Palamaner (SC) Assembly Constituency is void. The petitioner states that the respondent is a born Christian, professing Christianity and thereby, she was not eligible and qualified, to contest as a candidate, against a vacancy, reserved for Scheduled Caste. In the Election petition as well as the suppor



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top