SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 489

D.APPA RAO, D.S.R.VERMA
T. V. Ratnakar Rao – Appellant
Versus
Hemantha Kumar – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

(per the Hon’ble Mr.Justice

D.S.R. Varma)

Aggrieved by the judgment and decree, dated 06-03-2006, passed in O.S.No.422 of 2003, by the IX Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court (Fast Track Court) at Hyderabad, decreeing the suit for specific performance of the agreement of sale, dated 09-05-2003, and for a consequential injunction to restrain the defendant from transferring or alienating or changing the nature of the suit schedule property, the present City Civil Court Appeal is filed by the defendant in the suit.

2. Appellant is the defendant and respondents are the plaintiffs in the suit, before the court below.

3. For the sake of convenience, in this judgment, the parties herein are referred to as per their array in the suit.

4. The plaint averments, in brief, are that defendant is the absolute owner of the suit schedule property, bearing No.8-2-293/82/A 357, admeasuring 1176 sq.yards in Sy.No.120 (403-1, old), situated at Shaikpet village, Hyderabad of Jubilee Hills Cooperative House Building Society Limited, that there was an agreement of sale, dated 09-05-2003, under Ex.A-1, between the plaintiffs and the defendant to sell the suit schedule property for a sum of































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top