Based on the provided legal document, the court has emphasized that the findings recorded by both the courts below are to be confirmed and are not to be faulted. It has also been noted that the evidence, including the plaint plan and other documentary evidence, was thoroughly appreciated and considered in reaching the decision. The court explicitly states that the findings are upheld in light of the oral and documentary evidence, including the plaint plan, and that the second appeal is dismissed with the court making no order as to costs due to the close relationship between the parties (!) (!) (!) (!) .

Therefore, the court's decision indicates that the plaint plan, which was part of the evidence considered, cannot be regarded as conclusive or determinative in itself. The court's reliance on the entire body of evidence, including oral testimonies and other documentary proof, underscores that the plan alone does not hold decisive weight in establishing rights or facts. As a result, the plan cannot be considered as the sole or definitive basis for establishing the rights or facts in question.