SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 207

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Mohanan and Anr. – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat. C.J.- These two appeals and the revision application are interlinked. While the appeals have been filed by accused persons, who have been convicted, revision petition has been filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (1n short the Code) by widow of the deceased who lost his life in the alleged occurrence. For the sake of convenience, accused persons are referred to as A1, A2 etc. as they were arrayed as accused persons during trial.

2. Accused persons have been found guilty of offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 324 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860(1n short IPC) read with Section. 149 thereof. A2 and A7 are respondents 1 and 2 in the revision application. Except A2 and A7, all other accused were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. They were separately sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years for the offence punishable under Section 148 and simple imprisonment for one month for the offence punishable under Section 341. In View of the sentence imposed for offence punishable under Section 148, IPC, no separate sentence was awarded in respect of offences punishable under S






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top