K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Mohanan and Anr. – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Arijit Pasayat. C.J.- These two appeals and the revision application are interlinked. While the appeals have been filed by accused persons, who have been convicted, revision petition has been filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (1n short the Code) by widow of the deceased who lost his life in the alleged occurrence. For the sake of convenience, accused persons are referred to as A1, A2 etc. as they were arrayed as accused persons during trial.
2. Accused persons have been found guilty of offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 324 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860(1n short IPC) read with Section. 149 thereof. A2 and A7 are respondents 1 and 2 in the revision application. Except A2 and A7, all other accused were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. They were separately sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years for the offence punishable under Section 148 and simple imprisonment for one month for the offence punishable under Section 341. In View of the sentence imposed for offence punishable under Section 148, IPC, no separate sentence was awarded in respect of offences punishable under S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.