SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 468

G.ROHINI
Rodde Chandraiah – Appellant
Versus
Rodde Madunamma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:Mohd. Gulam Hussain, Advocate. For the Respondent:----

Judgment :-

This revision petition is directed against the order dated 28-03-2007 in I.A.No.78 of 2007 in O.P.No.18 of 2007 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Peddapalli. The revision petitioner is the first respondent in I.A.No.78 of 2007.

The first respondent herein is the wife of the revision petitioner. She had earlier filed O.S.124 of 2002 in the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Karimnagar seeking maintenance. The said suit was decreed ex parte on 28-09-2002 granting maintenance at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per month. Subsequently, the first respondent herein filed a fresh suit as in forma pauperis for enhancement of maintenance from Rs.3,000/- to Rs.10,000/- per month with retrospective effect. The said suit was registered on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Peddapalli as O.P.No.18 of 2007. The first respondent also filed I.A.No.78 of 2007 under Order XXXIX, Rule 1 and 2 CP.C., seeking temporary injunction restraining the respondents 2 to 4 herein from disbursing Rs.4,00,000/- out of Rs.12,00,000/- payable to the revision petitioner (first respondent therein) towards retirement benefits. In the said application, the Court below, by order, dated 28












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top