( 1 ) THE unsuccessful 1st respondent in AS No. 4l of 1994 on the file of ii Additional District Judge, Karimnagar, being aggrieved of the reversing judgment and decree of OS No. 737 of 1987 on the file of Principal District munsif, Karimnagar, challenged the same by way of Second Appeal.

( 2 ) THIS Court on 10. 6. 1997 made the following order:

"admit. The following substantial questions of law arise for consideration in the above Second Appeal: c) Whether a decree for perpetual injunction can be granted against a co-owner? d) Whether an unregistered gift deed is valid for the establishment of possession and title over the suit property? f) Whether the relief of perpetual injunction can be granted to the parties who have no title or interest over the property?"

( 3 ) SRI Y. Rama Rao, learned counsel representing the appellant-lst defendant made the following submissions: the learned counsel would submit that the reasons recorded by the court of first instance are just and proper reasons and the appellate Court had reversed the well-considered findings without properly appreciating the oral and documentary evidence available on record. The learned counsel would submit that the orig

Click Here to Read the rest of this document