G. S. SINGHVI, C. J.

( 1 ) WHETHER the entries contained in Parts I and II of Schedule ! of the Workmens compensation Act, 1923 (for short, the Act)are relevant for assessing the loss of earning capacity for non-schedule injuries, particularly in the context of requirement under explanation-ll to Section 4 (1) (c) (ii) is the question, which arises for determination in this appeal filed by the New India Assurance company Limited against award dated 4-4-2006 passed by Commissioner for workmens Compensation and Assistant commissioner of Labour-IV, Hyderabad (hereinafter described as the Commissioner)in W. C. No. 15 of 2004. Background Facts:

( 2 ) RESPONDENT No. 1 Abdul Khader Jilani was employed by respondent No. 2 smt. Mulam Bee for driving auto-rickshaw bearing No. AP-11 V-9066, which was owned by her. On 7-2-2004, a Maruthi car bearing no. AP-10d-8730 dashed against the autorickshaw at Sangeet X Roads, Secunderabad. As a result of the accident, respondent No. 1 suffered injuries. The police registered Crime no. 34 of 2004 under Section 337 IPC against the driver of the car. The same is pending trial before the competent Court.

( 3 ) RESPONDENT No. 1 filed an application under S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document