SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 911

B.SESHASAYANA REDDY
SHAIK KHADARU MASTHAN – Appellant
Versus
SAYYED FATHIMUN BEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.CHINNAPPA REDDY, NASARAIAH GOLLA

( 1 ) THE plaintiff in O. S. No. 171 of 2001 on the file of Principal Junior Civil judge, Sattenapalli is the revision petitioner. He filed the revision assailing the order dated 9. 3. 2007 passed in O. S. No. 171 of 2001 whereby and where under the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge upheld the objection of the defendant and refused to receive document dated 15. 6. 1982 in evidence.

( 2 ) FACTS of the case, in brief, giving rise to filing of this revision by the plaintiff in O. S. No. 171 of 2001 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, sattenapalli are: the plaintiff filed the suit for injunction simplicitor against the defendant in respect of the suit schedule property which comprises two items; item No. 1 admeasures Ac. 0. 55 cents and item No. 2 admeasures Ac. 0. 5. 5 cents. It is the case of the plaintiff that his mother gifted the suit schedule property in the year 1982 and put him in possession. He accepted the gift thereafter his mother executed a gift deed on 2. 5. 2001. The revenue authorities issued Pattedar pass Book in his favour. The defendant is no other than his sister. The defendant in order to grab the suit schedule property resorted to creating forged and














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top