SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 44

K.VENKATARAMAN
RAMU – Appellant
Versus
H. RAMACHANDRAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: C.Ramesh Babu, K.SRINIVASAN, P.Saritha, T.R.RAJARAMAN

( 1 ) THE original claimant in MATCOP No. 298 of 1988 before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional district Judge), Cuddalore has filed the appeal before this Court claiming enhanced compensation.

( 2 ) THE Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional District Judge), Cuddalore has awarded compensation of a sum of Rs. 40,000/- considering the injuries caused to him and also for pain and suffering due to the said injuries. Since the original claimant felt that the amount is very less compared to the injuries caused to him and for pain and suffering which he has undergone, has filed the present appeal. Pending appeal, the original claimant died and hence his wife has been brought on record as legal representative of the deceased original claimant by an order dated 4. 2. 1992 in c. M. P. No. 727 of 1992.

( 3 ) BEFORE deciding whether the present appellant is entitled to the enhanced compensation or not, it has to be decided first whether the legal representative of the deceased claimant is entitled to maintain the present appeal or not.

( 4 ) MS. SARITHA, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, contended that since the original claimant has already filed the appea















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top