SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 1142

G.ROHINI
V. K. SEKHAR – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN BANK, GREAMSET BRANCH CHITTOOR – Respondent


Advocates:
N.Rharat Eabu

( 1 ) THIS writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the Auction notice dated 16-1-2006 issued by the 1st respondent Bank proposing to sell the properties belonging to the petitioner under section 13 (4) of the Securitisation and reconstruction of Financial Assets and enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 is arbitrary and illegal.

( 2 ) IT is not in dispute that the writ petitioner having availed a loan from the 1st respondent Bank for establishment of a poultry farm, by mortgaging certain immovable properties as security, committed default in discharging the same and consequently the account was classified as non-performing asset. Thereafter, the respondents while invoking the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of financial Assets and Enforcement of security Interest Act, 2002 (for short, the securitisation Act, 2002), issued a notice dated 13-9-2005 under Section 13 (2) calling upon the petitioner to pay the amount due within 60 days. Since the petitioner failed to comply with the same, the respondents in exercise of powers under Section 13 (4)of the Act had taken possession of the secured assets on 28-9-2005 and 3-12-2005 and proposed to sell the s

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top