G.ROHINI
V. K. SEKHAR – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN BANK, GREAMSET BRANCH CHITTOOR – Respondent
( 2 ) IT is not in dispute that the writ petitioner having availed a loan from the 1st respondent Bank for establishment of a poultry farm, by mortgaging certain immovable properties as security, committed default in discharging the same and consequently the account was classified as non-performing asset. Thereafter, the respondents while invoking the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of financial Assets and Enforcement of security Interest Act, 2002 (for short, the securitisation Act, 2002), issued a notice dated 13-9-2005 under Section 13 (2) calling upon the petitioner to pay the amount due within 60 days. Since the petitioner failed to comply with the same, the respondents in exercise of powers under Section 13 (4)of the Act had taken possession of the secured assets on 28-9-2005 and 3-12-2005 and proposed to sell the s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.